[PLUG-Devel] IDE
Kevin Bowling
kevin.bowling at gmail.com
Wed Jul 7 01:07:32 MST 2010
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Joseph Sinclair <plug-devel at stcaz.net> wrote:
> I have used many IDE's (but not xcode, I don't use Mac).
> I generally prefer Netbeans for most development, I like it's interface and it's simple and fast compared to Eclipse.
> Eclipse is not too bad for C++ (but it's often horribly unstable on Linux due to bad "plugins").
> Both Eclipse and Netbeans are cross-platform and written in Java. Netbeans is dual-licensed CDDL and GPL v2; Eclipse has it's own Open-Source license.
Indeed, it depends a lot on the language you plan to write in.
I like Eclipse for Java and it can be extended to work well with many
languages, bug trackers, version control, etc. but it has a fairly
rigid project model that might take getting used to for a vi convert.
The Netbeans Swing UI throws me for a loop but it looks like it has
otherwise very good implementation. Both of these are very good for
common languages you might use to implement web applications.
> For Linux users, there are some nice native tools as well.
> MonoDevelop is not too bad if you want to develop C# or VB.Net code.
> KDevelop is nice for QT/KDE development.
> Code::Blocks (codeblocks) is a good very-simple IDE, a good transition from vi for C/C++ coding.
If you want a nice C++ environment that just works, Qt Creator is
really clean. It works on Mac, Windows, and Linux and contains the
excellent Qt library for making C++ GUI apps. KDevelop has the best
C++ introspection and autocompletion I've seen but they are in the
midst of a toolkit transition and it lacks a bit of polish.
>
> steve young wrote:
>> I'm an old school programmer and have used vi.
Don't be too quick discount vi, you might be impressed with gvim to
add just a bit to what you are already used to. Kate and gedit can
perform similar light weight roles. I prefer Kate to an IDE when
programming in C.
Regards,
Kevin
More information about the PLUG-devel
mailing list