encryption technology (was : Re: OT?: Legal question about p2p)
G Gambill
plug-devel@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
Wed Jun 1 11:55:07 2005
> -----Original Message-----
> From: plug-devel-admin@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> [mailto:plug-devel-admin@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us]On Behalf Of
> Technomage
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 7:08 PM
> To: plug-devel@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> Subject: Re: encryption technology (was : Re: OT?: Legal question =
about
> p2p)
>=20
>=20
> On Tuesday 31 May 2005 17:29, Mike Hoy wrote:
> > > even trading legal files (such as the linux operating system)=20
> can get you
> > > in dutch (especially if it contains ANY encryption technology=20
> the Federal
> > > government deems to be of "national security matter or concern").
> >
> > I was wondering if you could elaborate on this and maybe give an
> > example.
> >
> best example: pgp (phil zimmerman's work).
>=20
> the situation: PZ invented a new way to encrypt information that=20
> used a key=20
> pair system that was "secure enough" for the masses.=20
> unfortunately, it was=20
> also powerful enough to cause the Federal Government to have=20
> kittens. thus,=20
> they tried (through the rules and regulations in force at the time) to =
> prevent mr. zimmerman from exporting his technology. mind you, it=20
> was *his*=20
> technology, but the US government tried to claim eminent domain over =
it.=20
> hence a number of court cases and the emergence of an entire new=20
> market for=20
> tools of this type.
>=20
Didn't the Feds back off on this???
Was commerce (an in interstate) involved???
> hopefully, that answers a question or 2.
>=20
> mind you, I may have simplified this problem too far, but its=20
> been a bad habit=20
> of mine (of late) to try and keep things as simple as possible.
>=20
> TMH
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> PLUG-devel mailing list - PLUG-devel@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-devel
>=20
>=20