CVs Repository on a USB Stick
Ted Gould
plug-devel@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
Wed Feb 4 09:36:02 2004
--=-M2xNooqCKx6eIcq95z6S
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 08:22, Alan Dayley wrote:
> This is a common misconception based on historical realities. In other
> words, write cycle counts in the 10,000s used to be the norm for flash
> media. This has not been the case for several years. Almost any flash
> media you purchase presently will have write cycle counts of at least
> 100,000 with several manufacturers now quoting 300,000 or more.
That's not necessarily true either. We just had a customer spec these
flash parts that had ~100 writes. It sucked big time, believe me. It
depends on the requirements for the part - some people are just cheap.
> That said, it is true that flash media does wear out over time. It will
> just take a much longer time for modern flash than most people think.=20
> YMMV because some brands out there are junk.
Hear, hear. I guess the good question is: Is there somewhere on the web
that posts the number of writes by USB dongle manufacturer?
--Ted
--=-M2xNooqCKx6eIcq95z6S
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBAIRNbLE335pRPGp0RAp+SAKCAMsoV/lMADSHmUjAqvzhUm8pvPQCdH8md
klCI6uuXFfJmQ6jWgA/d3kw=
=pegM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-M2xNooqCKx6eIcq95z6S--