I am curious as to why I would receive a negative K/s rate in a bonnie++ benchmark report. Any one here know what is causing that?

Version 1.96Sequential OutputSequential InputRandom
Seeks
Sequential CreateRandom Create
SizeChunk SizePer CharBlockRewritePer CharBlockNum FilesCreateReadDeleteCreateReadDelete
K/sec% CPUK/sec% CPUK/sec% CPUK/sec% CPUK/sec% CPU/sec% CPU/sec% CPU/sec% CPU/sec% CPU/sec% CPU/sec% CPU/sec% CPU
Server1_2TB2200000M16k118999-108482299-48058749171699-99441451179.8101
Latency14407us5286ms15117ms12133us255ms2428usLatency
Server1_1TB1000000M16k11509912207089854048649202599113839150223.710151211784615886269912658561127061470702991283858
Latency14035us8034ms14505ms10103us17056us8022usLatency26259us109us6102us26528us21us96875us
Server2_2TB2200000M16k124799-100343690-44769543227499-96825347146611151211910607601809913063531197257633442991357255
Latency14019us11942ms17689ms9172us11503us7277usLatency18819us66us4139us12904us14us136ms
Server3_1TB1000000M16k95499994090985011683733339987149328193.398512465155389310021804671640035992111
Latency18941us30039us73502us6942us17076us7487usLatency3139ms331us45540us44647us24us53750us