Michael,

Thanks again for your comments, they are very helpful. I have been googling RAID1 and LVM and finding lots of good information.

I really like your idea of a RAID1 for the two SSDs. Does it matter if one is msata and one is not?

I am trying to decide on the merits of using LVM with the RAID1, since I only have 1 disk and I normally don't partition it so I don't have to worry about running our of space until the disk is almost full. Could you explain to me the benefit of using LVM + RAID1 for these two drives? How would you partition the drives? My current drive has about 420 GB of data in /home, about 9GB in /opt, and some misc stuff in /var, all of which I need to transfer that to the new system.

Thanks,

Mark

P.S. One benefit of using both LVM and RAID1 is learning something new! ;)


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Michael Butash <michael@butash.net> wrote:
I really never hit any io constraints on disks honestly since using ssd's.  I watch gkrellm like a hawk and tend to notice if something is amiss, and disks are never it, unless one dies.  I tend to abuse my system with 32db of ram and chrome and firefox each have seen using 10gb of ram each, nothing really ever slamming disks.

Some games/graphics intensive apps that use bitmap caching to /tmp or somewhere in home I'll give a ramdisk to ease it's pain.  This works well for things like minecraft servers to ease killing my ssd's prematurely.

I've never honestly benchmarked my disk i/o with raid, crypto, lvm, and a fs atop them, but honestly until I'm aggravated with a visible bottleneck, it's doing it's job.  I haven't had that in a desktop setting since going to SSD's, period.

I'm pretty happy with the msata mx100 micron's in my dell laptop so far.  The fact I can have 2x 512gb ssd disks in my 12" laptop and 16gb of ram is frigging great.

Do yourself a favour, get a usb3 spindle disk for the bulk data and get a smaller ssd.  I used 32, then 64, then 128, then 256, now up to 512gb disks that I don't feel I'm getting utterly screwed having to buy 2x for resiliency.  Slice your data partitions adequately and learn to live within your means.  You quickly figure out what data you really need or don't when you have to add space, but lvm's make that painless.  At home I just do this with a nas direct, but I rsync a lot of stuff against that for backups and working between laptop/desktop on the road or not.

My worst offenders are email, everyone else's data I carry about (hoards of data and docs from customers), stupid windoze xp vm as my visio runtime, and a few games if they go local.  I'm fairly glad being a linux zealot I was weaned off pc games by mid 2000's, seeing some actually want a few hundred gigs of space these days. Same reason I don't use win7, they have the audacity to ask for 25gb for a base install, just so I can run visio somewhere.  Not when I have a 64gb drive. and xp is fine as a hypervisor for visio in seamless vbox mode.

Enter lucidchart, it's actually a decent replacement for visio now.  Then I'm finally free of any real need for windoze at all.

-mb



On 09/03/2014 10:20 AM, Mark Phillips wrote:

Michael,

Great info...Thanks!

Are there any performance (or other issues) between a raid1with two 1tb msata ssds and rsync between one 1tb msata ssd and 7200 rpm 1tb hdd? I like the idea of raid1 with two ssds, but not sure if I am ready to buy 2 1tb ssds. And yes, I really need a 1 tb drive.....Just consider me a hoarder of data...;)

Mark


---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss