If i want an advanced disk arrangement or an alternate desktop environment i use the server install media. Frequently if my hardware is at all iffy or i have bleeding edge graphics ill use it then as well.
On Sunday, January 5, 2014, Michael Butash wrote:
On 01/05/2014 12:14 PM, Brian Cluff wrote:
I've managed to do a RAID install a couple of times from the desktop CD,
but what a pain in the butt! The only reason that I didn't just reach
for a server CD was that I was either behind extremely slow Internet, or
didn't have access to it in the first place, and it's only slightly
easier to go through the pain of hand creating a RAID from the desktop
CD than it is to convert a non-RAIDed system to a RAID 1 afterwards.
That being said, the Desktop install does fill the needs of the vast majority of users and gives them that "pretty" interface they they expect from a professional product.
It would be nice if they would have the Desktop install fail over to a server/text style install if a graphical environment isn't able to start, or if you press a key while it's booting for those of us that would like a RAID setup or "advanced" install.
I was pretty bummed/hostile toward the fact they stopped producing the alt desktop installer versions. As you say, the debian installer is about bulletproof whereas Ubuntu's desktop installer has always been a chronic basketcase for me to use. So commonly so, I never know if its just gross incompetence or broken by design. They really need to keep that as a fallback just in case ubiquity continues to suck perpetually.
Case in point - I want to do raid. The live desktop doesn't include mdadm natively (it does at least cryptsetup and lvm tools now), but puts the package in the archive to use on the disk. Just flippin' install it by default and let users make the choice! I think I found doing so, even after installing to the raided set built in the desktop, I still had to chroot to the install and add the package to the installation, and rebuild the initrd before reboot lest I see an (initrd) prompt. Good thing grub setup didn't setup my efi properly and I didn't even get that far!
Apparently the community needs to come together to figure out a "standard" around partitioning for EFI as well. Arch and Ubuntu seem to handle partitioning and expectations very differently - that was about 60% my constant issue, figuring out exactly what they wanted via trial and error. Either should work, but they explicitly refuse to work with each other's methods...
Also how to make those pesky fat32 partitions redundant with mirrored disks... At least without efi, I could mdraid /boot, and don't want to deal with fakeraid bs. I have to mount the secondary efi as /boot/efi1 to setup an rsync cron to copy the files - at least grub install in the deb installer writes both entries to the efi bios loader should/when one fails.
Brian Cluff
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss