On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:11 AM, Joseph Sinclair <plug-discussion@stcaz.net> wrote:

Normally, an Access Point is intended as the base station part of a Wi-Fi network.
It is possible, sometimes, to use one as a wireless bridge (which is what you're describing in connecting it to the ethernet port), but I'd be very leery of using such a low-cost unit in that role; it's not entirely uncommon to see low-end units like that function very poorly or not-at-all.

As for antenna size, a 2.4GHz antenna is generally going to be most efficient at 1/4 it's wavelength of 12.5cm. Most small devices have an antenna of about triginal signal via multipath amplification (basically using weaker signals from other angles to amplify the strongest core signal).

You might be better off getting a newer Wireless N USB dongle with 2 (or more) internal antennae for multipath diversity (which usually provides better signal in home environments than dipole amplification) rather than tying the machine to a fixed bridge of uncertainC

quality.

Oh, Sorry!

I didn't look at those links right [too early in the AM (sleep working)]; my BAD! Let's clear this up:

The size of the antenna is not the only conseration for reception. You are going to be addressing driver protocol issues (since 802.11G/B/N are actually implemented in non-standard varients in small ways depending on the manufacturer) and often link up better to their own kind or AP's and cards known to function well together. Another consideration is going to be AP beacon strength. I have an older card that does not connect with anything but a Netgear 802.11B AP.

You possibly are misunderstanding the difference between the term AP and standalone cards? Almost any Wifi card can become an AP depending on how it is intialized.

This AP:

ENCORE ENRXWI-G 802.11b/g Wireless LAN Extender up to 54Mbps

Is someone off-brand and is actually an AP (access point) that can be "bridged together" to span wide areas that cannot meet coverage themselves, so that users can "roam" between AP's and authenticate to one source.

This Encore is probably not a very reliable unit, but I didn't do the typical due diligence RESEARCH (Google it) to verify what people are saying, etc. I imagine it has protocol issues with some varieties of cards, like the difference in DLink and Netgear in the early days (13 years ago). Also, it would not be a connection solution for your sisters system, since it's not going to provide a local connection or adapter, which the system can use. Its strictly standalone.

The second link is:

D-Link DWA-125 IEEE 802.3/3u, IEEE 802.11g, IEEE802.11n Draft 2 USB 2.0 Wireless Adapter Up to 150Mbps Wireless Data Rates

This is a USB adapter 2.0 connected device for computers that do not have a card slot either PCMCIA or internally. Wireless 2.0 USB devices function significantly faster than Wireless data throughput, (firewire...?) so that is not going to be a factor (if you don't have a slot or open bay); however if her onboard USB driver in the OS (old XP?) (and in really ancient hardware bios firmware does) not operate at USB 2.0 you will have connection issues.

Be sure your current issues are not also related to a USB 2.0 driver issue, an IRQ conflict, or a short in the cabling, before you assume new hardware will fix it. The first step toward verifying this link is to patch your system to current recommended versions (if Windows, MAC or Linux) and update both the driver and device fiirmware if a flash version is available (often not).

If your current AP or "router" is perhaps not 802.11g, your card "adapter' is not going to be able to connect via those speeds/stability. I believe that Dlink's DWA-125 IEEE rates 802.3/3u provides for integration with the USB stack or driver/LAN layer, but I would have to read the fufll specifications.

I hope that helps.

==Joseph++

Steven wrote:
> Okay, this one seems like a no-brainer question to me but I haven't
> dealt with one before. A wireless access point like this one:
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833180035 should
> get better reception with that antenna than one of those little stubby
> USB adapters like this:
> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833127272
>
> My sister's computer is hooking into our wireless using a USB wireless
> adapter about the size of that second link (although it's too old to
> still show up on Newegg, I'm just pointing to something similar in
> size), and it's never had great reception, but lately it's been very
> flaky. Looking over things I realized those access points start in the
> same price range as the USB adapters while having those nice antennas
> that are longer than the USB sticks are even including the USB plug.
>
> That said, I've never actually used an access point, it's always either
> been a built in laptop adapter, a PCMCIA adapter (which got a lousy
> signal going through two fewer walls than are between the wireless
> router and my sister's computer), or one of those USB wireless adapter
> sticks. If I'm catching how it works correctly her computer should
> simply see it as a plain old connection over the build in Ethernet port,
> correct?
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss