On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:05 AM, R P Herrold
<herrold@owlriver.com> wrote:
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Lisa Kachold wrote:
OPPS, I seem to have started a political conversation!
no, you made some assertions as to technical matter [with seemingly a Linux client hook], and I asked for some URLs to demonstrate the basis for your belief. A third party wanted to be a lawyer on a mailing list with some hearsay as well, but that is out of scope here
My question echoes that of Joe Friday:
"All we want are the facts, ma'am"
I can perform my own analysis and argue almost any side of an opinion given facts I can rely upon
Lisa, for context:
It is currently being used by NSA and government surveillance of citizens of interest, or it can be used for technical support purposes.
herrold: A strong assertion.
... snip ...
Conspicuously absent from a google search is non 'tinfoil hat' evidence beyond supposition and capabilities, and actually showing improper use by a federal agency
Please, prove me wrong with URLs I missed
-- Russ herrold
I did not state improper use. It's all legal as of Presidential Special Order.
--