Performance is a nightmare, but if you have a lot of data it is still viable. And I have been saved too many times from drive failures. "Oh, drive failed huh, well good thing it kicked in and rebuilt on the hot spare, I will order a new one this week and oh look no down time." :)

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Craig White <craigwhite@azapple.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 09:20 -0700, JD Austin wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Lisa Kachold
> <lisakachold@obnosis.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>         Of course for mission critical data, I recommend RAID 5 or
>         RAID 1+0 at the very least.
>
>
>         AND ALL BACKUPS REQUIRE A RESTORE TEST - laugh!  You all can
>         appreciate this point?
>
>
> I second the restore test.. we had a wonderful Legato backup system
> that made backups that couldn't be restored.
> Never assume it works ;)
----
Somewhere it must be written that the name Legato means horribly complex solutions that never really quite work as they are supposed to but damn, someone paid a lot of money for the exercise in gymnastics...thanks.

By the way...RAID 5 - for all purposes these days, it's dead. It is
being put to death by drive densities that keep increasing while error
rates remain constant. Given the low performance of RAID 5, who cares
anyway.

Craig


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss