That makes sense. Similar to what I was thinking, except I didn&#39;t account for the possibility of another network.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 11:59 PM, der.hans <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:PLUGd@lufthans.com">PLUGd@lufthans.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Am 26. Jul, 2009 schwätzte David Munson so:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Whoops. Didn&#39;t reply-all on that last one.<br>
<br>
Weird. @ is something I&#39;d expect to see on a username to designate operator<br>
privileges. I&#39;ve checked out the <a href="http://webchat.freenode.net" target="_blank">webchat.freenode.net</a> and it&#39;s working OK as<br>
far as I can tell...<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
He probably ended up on a different irc network and created the up until<br>
then nonexistent #ABLEconf. As channel creator he was automagically given<br>
operator status in the channel.<br>
<br>
That also explains why he was in channel with no one else while we were<br>
having a meeting in the channel :).<br>
<br>
ciao,<br>
<br>
der.hans<br><font color="#888888">
-- <br>
#  <a href="http://www.LuftHans.com/" target="_blank">http://www.LuftHans.com/</a>        <a href="http://www.LuftHans.com/Classes/" target="_blank">http://www.LuftHans.com/Classes/</a><br>
#  &lt;allbery_b&gt; wouldn&#39;t that be &quot;shopping is hard, let&#39;s do math&quot;?</font></blockquote></div><br>