might be reading it at

HENCE (probably) the reason why kite pilot wanted to

provide a "clue" as to his contact info, in the body of the message.

((apparently, in a form intended to "NOT" be very useful to a robot...))

Oh, wait a minute. I just noticed that, at that "archive" URL, (see [1]),

his entire e-mail address (in a form suitable to be useful even to a robot)

appears, right in the "Author:" header, of the message.

Is this due to a RECENT CHANGE? Didn't our "lurker" software have a

policy (as of some very recent time) to always mangle e-mail addresses,

to be less convenient for spambot harvesting?

I think what it usually does, is, put the "name" in the archived message, but

in some cases, (like this one), where the "e-mail address" does not "come

with" any [other] name, apparently it just defaults the "name" to be, the

same as the "e-mail address".

I suspect that (if this is true) (or, if something 'close' to this is true), then

kite pilot might not have realized this (and, the implications).

--
Mike Schwartz
Glendale AZ
schwartz@acm.org

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Stephen <cryptworks@gmail.com> wrote:

id honestly find it easier to look at the sender line... :-)

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 6:50 AM,
kitepilot@kitepilot.com<kitepilot@kitepilot.com> wrote:
> Has any programmer in this list written Java code using the Htmlunit
> framework?
> If you can lend me a hand, please contact me off list at:
> k1tepil0t[AT]kitep1l0t(DOT)c0m
> Make sure you replace the numbers above with letters! :)
> Tnx.
> ET
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - [...]

--
Stephen

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [...]