On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Joe <lists@joefleming.net> wrote:Thanks for that, I had no idea Adobe had anything like this. The only downfall is it's limited to 15 participants at a time. Their Connect Pro solution might work though, I don't see anything about a participant limit. They don't have pricing for that online though, which leads me to believe it's pretty expensive. Still, thanks, we'll check that out! -JoeJoe - If you get more than a few folks into a meeting you want broadcast not conference ware - icecast will broadcast audio & video, good for a group that doesnt need to interact in channel. Pair icecast with an Asterisk VoIP conference for audio feeedback and you should be able to handle a good size group. EdJudd Pickell wrote:This works on macs, windows and linux: http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobatconnect/ but not entirely sure if it is everything you are looking for. There is also a pro version which may offer more features that would be useful. On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Joe <lists@joefleming.net> wrote:My company is in the process of trying to set up virtual meetings, including things like screencasting/sharing, voice, video, whiteboard, etc. The office is all Mac, our clients are mostly Windows, and I'm on Linux. We've been trying to find something that will work for everyone and is easy to use, but so far haven't come up with much. Webex seems to work, but I can't get screen or document sharing to work from Linux, and it also lacks voice. Most of the others either didn't run at all or don't have any Linux client. Recently I set up a VNC server on my machine and used our VPN to broadcast back to the office and Skype to handle the audio. It worked, but not well, and it's definitely not something that we can use with our clients. So, fellow Linux users, got any other suggestions for what I should be using? I'd settle for something that didn't have voice if everything else worked really well, but of course, I'd like to have everything in one package. -Joe