What question is "No" a response to?No,
Sure, my response was simply pointing out possible subjects that his regular expression of ".*OT.*" would filter out. Microsoft Outlook Web Access has no filtering options, not that it matters as I do all of my filtering with Mozilla Thunderbird :-)you simply the filtering (beit procmail or simple ciscolearning SharePoint Microsoft Exchange webmail, or Yahoo, MSN, gmail) as ":OT " [notice space and preceeding colon].
> Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 23:55:04 -0700
> From: charles.jones@ciscolearning.org
> To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> Subject: Re: On topic message about Off topic messages
>
> Kurt Granroth wrote:
> > * ^Subject:.*OT.*
> > The Subject rule will
> > match any instance of OT... even if it's part of another word. I
> > was tempted to put a regex in front and back to limit the matches but
> > didn't, since a) it wouldn't handle things like WayOT and the like
> > and b) I can't think of many cases where a subject would have OT
> > in an existing word, anyway.
> >
> I could think of a few:
> OTHER LINUX DISTROS?
> GOT ROOT?
> OPTICAL DRIVES?
> HOTEL WIFI HACKING
> POTENTIAL EXPLOITS
> OTTERS ATE MY ETHERNET!
>
> ;-)