I just thought I'd throw this out there, since it's related...

I just threw a LAN party on the 31st with about 18 people. One of those people ran Linux (Ubuntu 7.10) for the reason that he couldn't install Windows on his computer. He said that his Windows XP license is an upgrade from a Windows 98 license which is also an upgrade license, and nothing older than that recognizes his CD-ROM drive. He already had most of the games we were going to play (some recent, some older: Counter-Strike: Source, Warcraft III, Starcraft, Age of Empires III) working with Wine. For the rest (or ones that were simply buggy) I threw my copy of Cedega on there and pointed them to his Wine directories for the shortcuts, and the games ran and performed fairly well.

The cons were not really show-stoppers. A minor performance loss and a slightly more complicated installation process. The things he missed out on were tools like Daemon Tools and Daemonscript (which I combined so nobody would have to pass around CDs)--not the games themselves. That said, real Linux games hardly exist outside of Id Software's stuff, and the selection of Windows games guaranteed to work with Cedega/Wine is somewhat small, including only the biggest titles.

On Dec 27, 2007 9:43 PM, JT Moree <moreejt@pcxperience.com> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Judd Pickell wrote:
> Sorry, but this argument falls on its face when you consider the cost
> of the console and quality of the game. When a console costs as much
> as the upgrades to a PC, I hardly call that being better. Especially
> since the cost of the games is almost the same.


You seem to miss my point entirely.  I disagree with your arguments but
we're quite off topic I think.

Let me recap:

Chris made a point about gaming on windows being better than other PC
platforms.  I did NOT disagree with this statement--in fact I agreed
with it.  But I went a step further and made a point that gaming on
Windows stinks compared to consoles.

I then gave reasons why PC gaming (Windows, LInux, MAc) is never as
simple and easy as a console.  I am the one who gets calls from friends
and family to help with their stupid PC problems.  I"ll be happy to
refer them to you if you disagree with my assessment. ;)

I ended by saying people who want to play games should buy consoles (so
that they dont' call ME when they have problems.)

You seemed to reply with something along the lines of: consoles are
lower quality and more expensive to upgrade than PCs.  Again, I disagree
with this but it's OK to disagree with each other.

Then you proceeded to explain why LInux has few commercial games.  Yes I
agree with all of that and it only reinforces my point.

I don't think there's anything constructive to say here.  I suppose you
can reply if I've misunderstood your response but is this discussion
serving any purpose?  I'm regretting that I replied to the OP.

- --
JT Morée
PC Xperience, Inc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHdH7u1JwGi/ukQqERAtU7AKDthXX218ZAhmllf28cY9NvMmoafgCfXBk1
XLfYN5Eh//purtT2U0ETaDE=
=OpL4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support.

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss



--
Amarok: Rediscover your music.
-- http://amarok.kde.org

Sabayon Linux: Cutting Gentoo's edge.
-- http://www.sabayonlinux.org