The intent / reference might not have been, to
refer to [the OP of a sub thread:] Josef Lowder when saying
> the person who recently offered up his grandfatherly opinion
I think it might have been meaning someone else -
such as perhaps the person (keith smith? I think?) who added:
[in the 2nd post?]:
> Add PLUG reserves the right to suspend or remove any account not in compliance.
...Just a guess, from
--
Mike Schwartz
Glendale AZ
schwartz@acm.org
On 8/29/07,
keith smith <klsmith2020@yahoo.com> wrote:
Josef, thanks for your courage and leadership.
Josef Lowder <joe@actionline.com
> wrote: .
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:01, Joshua Zeidner wrote
... snip snip snip ...
> If the person who recently offered up his grandfatherly
> opinion of the whole thing feels he is in the position
> of leadership here, he should make that abundantly clear.
... snip snip snip ...
I guess this little bit of sarcasm was aimed at me.
I merely observed that Joseph Sinclair made some very good
points and suggested that it might be helpful to adapt those
valuable points to a succinct list of PLUG Netiquette Guidelines
(not "rules" or "laws" or "mandates") ... but merely guidelines
as points of reference to encourage civility.
Very sorry if this "grandfatherly opinion"
was offensive
to anyone.
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - [...]
------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
[...]