Admittedly I did not read all the posts to this thread before deleting them, but has anyone pointed out that Linus Torvalds does not agree ( http://blogs.zdnet.com/Ou/?p=559 ) with the supposed severity of these "bugs".  Also the description I read more often was that much of this is the result of people discovering and using undocumented "functionality".  When was the last time a CPU existed that did not have some such thing discovered?

On 7/2/07, Darrin Chandler <dwchandler@stilyagin.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 12:11:48PM -0500, JT Moree wrote:
> http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=118296441702631
>
> Theo's take (openbsd) on some core2 bugs.

There are also articles on the OpenBSD Journal (http://undeadly.org/)
about that, and a followup article on Matt Dillon's (of DrangonflyBSD)
comments on these errata.

--
Darrin Chandler            |  Phoenix BSD User Group  |  MetaBUG
dwchandler@stilyagin.com   |  http://phxbug.org/      |   http://metabug.org/
http://www.stilyagin.com/  |  Daemons in the Desert   |  Global BUG Federation
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss



--
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.  - Dr. Seuss