Another interesting thing. Normally, if I am reading a discussion-list thread and someone responds to it while I am reading, I get a message that there is an update from a named user and do I want the conversation (thread) updated. That does not happen if I am the responder but I stay reading the conversation. However, immediately upon returning to the inbox, the email list shows the additional response from me.
BTW, my reply to Darrin's message showed up immediately. My thinking is that the option in the discussion list has a boundary condition on messages so the zeroth message is not echoed to the sender even though it is sent to the member list except for the originator. Subsequent messages (1-n) do get sent and work properly for the echo to originator.On 6/12/07, Dazed_75 < lthielster@gmail.com> wrote:Interesting !!! I just refreshed my inbox and see this message from you, but my original post has not shown up for me. Seems the test is working. So if anyone wants to comment on this, do it in this thread please. IOW, please continue to not reply to my original message to the discussion list.--On 6/12/07, Darrin Chandler < dwchandler@stilyagin.com> wrote:On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 06:22:26PM -0700, Dazed_75 wrote:
You have no idea how much I wanted to reply to your test message, but I
did not. Yet...
--
Darrin Chandler | Phoenix BSD User Group | MetaBUG
dwchandler@stilyagin.com | http://phxbug.org/ | http://metabug.org/
http://www.stilyagin.com/ | Daemons in the Desert | Global BUG Federation
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seuss
--
Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. - Dr. Seuss