-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-earlier message:<br>I seem to remember reading something some time ago that led me to<br>believe that forwarding &quot;as attachment&quot; was preferable (somehow better)<br>than forwarding &quot;inline&quot;. I may be mistaken.
<br><br>In the Thunderbird tutorial, I see this:<br>Unless you have specific reasons not to include an email forward inline,<br>you should let emails be forwarded inline, by consideration for the<br>recipient: scrolling down is a lot easier than double clicking an email
<br>attachment.<br><br>Can anyone explain why one would want to forward as attachment?<br><br>TIA<br>--<br>-Eric 'shubes'<br clear="all">-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-<br><br>It seems to me that inline would be more trusted, as attachments sometimes bear unwelcome gifts. This would be especially true if the message were not HTML. I vote for inline...
<br>-- <br>...Rich