You can get a whole shell main buffer in standard Linux Emacs.  I have no
idea what adaptive technology tools will do with it.  Back when I used BASH
via the Emacs full edit screen shell buffer, it was more convenient than a
terminal app in a lot of ways.  It also had some nasty gotchas or glitches,
but that was two decades ago.

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021, 12:36 der.hans via PLUG-discuss <
plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org> wrote:

> moin moin,
>
> I got a question about terminal accessibility. The accessiblity team there
> has orca for GUI. Looks like orca was originally for providing
> accessibility for GNOME.
>
> orca - Scriptable screen reader
>
> They still need something  that works for command line.
>
> Anyone know if orca works with gnome-terminal to provide accessibility for
> command line?
>
> I found the following packages, but have no experience with them.
>
> fenrir - Userland console (TTY) screen reader written in python
> yasr - General-purpose console screen reader
>
> Also, a two parter emacs question.
>
> One can run shell commands in emacs. Can the experience be terminal like
> enough to use that as the shell? The vi mechanism for running commands is
> not sufficient to pretend it's a shell.
>
> If the emacs command line interface is usable as a shell, does emacsspeak
> provide a sufficient audio interface for it?
>
> ciao,
>
> der.hans
> --
> #  https://www.LuftHans.com   https://www.PhxLinux.org
> #  Freedom isn't everything, but without freedom you have nothing. -
> der.hans
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss