The biggest difference is, files can become fragmented while partitions don't. On a hard drive this can make a big difference. On an SSD I would tend not to use a swap partition or file. If you use a swap partition on an SSD it would confine the writes to a smaller area of the disk and wear it out faster. So a file would work much better because it has the whole disk to even out the writes. But you do a lot of swapping that also puts more wear onto the SSD. So I would tend to put my swap on a hard drive. On Wed, Oct 28, 2020, 8:57 AM Seabass via PLUG-discuss < plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org> wrote: > I tend to prefer swapfiles. > Doesn't require a partition, so it can be resized easily and won't require > you to know the partition number. (Opinion: fewer partitions is just easier) > It is encrypted swap when on a fully encrypted drive without needing more > partitioning work. > > I don't actually know a reason to make swap a partition over a swapfile. I > imagine there is a partition setting somehow or maybe the inability to > resize is desirable, but that hasn't been my use case before. > > To be fair though... I don't use hibernate so don't really need a swap > either. So it is rare I'd need it anyway. > ------------------------------ > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2020 21:22:57 -0700 > From: Jim > To: plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org > Subject: swap file vs swap partition > Message-ID: <4613ab4d-61b5-34b0-4944-d0917cec234e@gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > Regarding swap file vs swap partition: Is one better than the other? > When I installed Kubuntu on my machine, both options were available and > I chose the swap file. The OS is installed on an > SSD--------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss