> > Unless the government is somehow involved, Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, etc. > aren't suppressing free speech. They have the right to censor whatever we > say, since it is their network we are using. I agree in principle, but these platforms are working in conjunction with governments to suppress views they do no like. So, while I agree that a private business can run this way they should stop the pretense of being an open platform. On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:44 AM, Matthew Crews wrote: > > I would say it has picked up in popularity for the same reason Gab > > and so many others have picked up in popularity. People are > > awakening to the fact that twitter and other main stream social > > media networks (facebook, reddit) are censoring comments and > > we are actively losing our right to free speech. > > Unless the government is somehow involved, Facebook, Reddit, Twitter, etc. > aren't suppressing free speech. They have the right to censor whatever we > say, since it is their network we are using. > > Conversely, we also have the right to not use such services that actively > censor. > > Remember: On any service that relies on advertising revenue, the user is > the > "product", and not the service itself. The customer is advertisers. > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >