You make some really great points. I can attest in an enterprise environment MacOS is a pain. Lync integration and corporate wireless is such a challenge. Esp when you need to import MS Certs for AD authentication. I use Linux at work and so far I can get 90% of my work done. Anything else I have Win10 in VB. On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Michael Butash wrote: > I would tend to disagree here. As a business owner for a few years and a > full-time linux user for 10+ years, I've really not had any reason still to > go back. I do my own accounting and time management with Freshbooks/Xero, > payroll with Gusto, LibreOffice for all docs, master pdf editor for editing > pdf's (go figure), Gimp for images, Dialpad for voice/acd/ivr, > UberConference for audio conferencing/collaboration, and gapps for most > everything else. > > The only things I do in windoze is customers that insist on using crappy > conferencing like webex/gotomeeting, visio for network/application design > documents, and that's it. I call it my visio hypervisor as I usually just > run vbox windoze in seamless, just pretending windoze isn't there. > > Linux is fairly viable for enterprise use imho too, probably more so than > the idiots that would be forced to use them. I had a short stint returning > to an old employer here, where like most, run windoze for everything > desktop-y, and I ran linux on my laptop there mostly OK. Worst issues for > me were generally using pam-mount for automounting windoze dfs shares > (homedirs, doc dirs, etc), wired/wireless network transition with said > mounting (kernel freaking out when cifs would disconnect shares), and the > fact companies still insist on using crappy products like office365 that > don't work for anything but windoze. I actually began organizing > internally other stealth linux users (tampering with the os there was a > fireable offense, f-em) and documenting howto's in conflucence to function > in the wild. > > Macs in the enterprise were worse. There I had been in charge of wireless > for a bit, so I had to test macs and was given one to use as all the new > management cronies flooding in insisted on them. Nothing "just worked", > especially when you start talking AD integration, certs, wireless, etc, and > macs quickly became the bain of my existence there to support on the > network. Apple was useless to support any real enterprise integration as > well. I unaffectionately referred to them as shiny speak-n-spells jammed > into the enterprise world. > > Aside from that, Outlook/Lync products were garbage for mac, which M$ > execs themselves told us it would never not suck, as it might create > competition, otherwise I just used Libre to replace crappy word/excel. > Every application I needed to function cost something, and usually absurdly > priced. I am not used to having to pay for anything having used linux for > so long, and just nauseated me with a constant up sell. Top off that their > hardware is usually older/slower anyways, I really didn't see why people > like them. It genuinely frustrated me to use that it just sat in my desk. > > So yeah, I call bullocks on the mac for anything other than a status > symbol, but whatever floats your boat. > > -mb > > > On 08/24/2016 05:24 PM, James Dugger wrote: > > I switched from Microsoft to Linux on all servers and desktops in my > former business only to switch the desktops to Apple products from Linux. > Linux just doesn't have parody in new application implementations on the > desktop where it mattered. And I haven't met a business owner yet who was > willing to hang out in Linux until someone got around to making it work. > > > > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >