Is it correct that with apt-get unstable refers to the amount of testing done with the system? I do not think it refers the alfa/beta status of the program. :-)~MIKE~(-: On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Michael Havens wrote: > to the mint forums I go! Thanks for your help Mark. I'll post what I find > out there after I hear back from them. > > :-)~MIKE~(-: > > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Mark Phillips > wrote: > >> >> On Jan 3, 2015 11:14 AM, "Michael Havens" wrote: >> > >> > so then, is just for lower than the version that are in the >> apt-cache. >> >> Actually, the version you want has to be in your sources.list. >> >> glad I'm talking to you all about this because I just discovered that >> after you run = you need to run : >> > >> > sudo echo “package hold” | sudo dpkg –set-selections >> >> Only if you don't want the package upgraded at the next apt-get upgrade. >> >> > >> > I also discovered that to find the versions in the repository you run: >> > >> > apt-cache showpkg packagename >> > >> > so is there no way to force a version into apt-cache? >> >> The sources.list just says where to find a package. Sort of like a big >> phone book...if you don't have the white pages for Ajo, you can't find your >> friend's phone number who lives in Ajo. Once you get the Ajo book, you have >> access to everyone's phone number in Ajo, but you are only interested in >> your friend's number. >> >> Pinning tells apt to only use the 2011 edition of the Ajo phone book to >> look up your friend's phone number, even though you now subscribe to the >> latest version of the Ajo phone book. You still have all the latest phone >> numbers on hand, which does not impact your selection of the 2011 phone >> number for your friend's phone number. >> >> I just tried to force the installation of the unstable version of the >> package (sudo apt-get install kmymoney/unstable) but it seems as if it >> isn't called 'unstable' in mint (ubuntu). Am I doing it wrong? What are the >> Archives called in Mint (ubuntu) >> >> Sorry, I have never used mint. Just a long time Debian user who recently >> switched to Ubuntu for my desktop with my new laptop...It came >> pre-installed. ;-) >> >> Mark >> >> > >> > :-)~MIKE~(-: >> > >> > On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 10:32 AM, Michael Havens >> wrote: >> >> >> >> help immensely. Thank you Mark. >> >> >> >> :-)~MIKE~(-: >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 9:08 AM, Mark Phillips < >> mark@phillipsmarketing.biz> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Michael, >> >>> >> >>> If all you have is the stable branch in your sources.list, then you >> won't have access to any of the testing packages, even if you specify >> testing on the command line with apt-get. apt-get has to know where to find >> the package you want to download, which is why sources.list exists. If you >> want to be able to install both testing and stable packages, then you have >> to have both stable and testing branches listed in your sources.list. >> >>> >> >>> If you want to hold a package to a specific version or branch >> (stable, testing, experimental), then you can "pin" that package to that >> version, and all future updates will only use that version. Take a look at >> http://jaqque.sbih.org/kplug/apt-pinning.html. However, you still have >> to have the correct repositories listed in sources.list, and you have to >> run an apt-get upgrade to update the local cache so the OS knows where to >> find the packages you want. >> >>> >> >>> Hope that helps! >> >>> >> >>> Mark >> >>> >> >>> On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 1:02 AM, Michael Havens >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> A specific version of a package can be selected for installation by >> >>>> following the package name with an equals (=) and the version of the >> package to select. This will cause that version to be located and selected >> for install. Alternatively, a specific distribution can be selected by >> following the package name with a slash (/) and the version of the >> distribution or the Archive name (i.e. stable, testing, unstable). >> >>>> >> >>>> source: http://linux.die.net/man/8/apt-get >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> So this is saying to me you don't need the PPA to install the latest >> version but can instead do: >> >>>> = >> >>>> >> >>>> If that is so we don't need to add PPAs to our systems. IN other >> words PPAs are just a way to make it so that we are always running the >> latest version of the package regardless of if it works whereas we choose >> what we want to run with: >> >>>> = >> >>>> That is very Linuxy of them! >> >>>> :-)~MIKE~(-: >> >>>> >> >>>> --------------------------------------------------- >> >>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org >> >>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: >> >>>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------- >> >>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org >> >>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: >> >>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------- >> > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org >> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: >> > http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------- >> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: >> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >> > >