Wasn't the previous solution to disable dhcp on the second router? Then of course it wouldn't give out the new addresses... On Aug 3, 2014 3:33 PM, "Michael Havens" wrote: > well the deal is that I didn't want to run another cable from my router. > My confusion isn't on getting it to work but rather the numbers that have > been assigned from the second router. I was thinking that it might have to > do with perhaps they had already been assigned ip addresses but the lfs > computer was not previously assigned a number. Is it that the modem is > handing out addresses until it gets to 192.168.0.125 and then the router > takes over in giving addresses? > > :-)~MIKE~(-: > > > On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Wayne Davis > wrote: > >> >> You DO NOT need to use another router. One is sufficient and 200 feet >> of wire would not be a problem. For stronger wireless, you COULD add >> another WIRED access point to your network. In fact (I) do exactly that. >> I have a AP near the front of the house, and another near the back. I have >> about 30 "devices" on the network.... but ONE router / DHCP box is quite >> sufficient for it all. Your issue is more than likely multiple DHCP >> servers. For YOUR network, that is probably not needed. >> >> * If you like, I will help you further via phone (MUCH MORE EFFICIENT >> THAN TYPING) Private message me with your number.* >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------- >> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: >> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >> > > > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >