Hans,

On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 9:14 PM, der.hans <PLUGd@lufthans.com> wrote:

> Am 16. Jun, 2013 schwätzte Nathan England so:
>
> moin moin,
>
>  This is seriously rediculous! Why did a question about KDE become Off
>> Topic?
>> Was this an accident? Was this intentional?
>>
>
> Ryan set OT for his response to your question about CotS. That was a good
> move by him as that part of the thread had wandered off-topic.
>
> KDE is obviously on topic, but the response wasn't about KDE.
>
>  Was it just to test the new OT: fliters?
>>
>
> Dunno. Ryan will have to answer that question.
>
> Now my dilemma, do I fix that tag syntax to be TO: since the thread
> wandered off to off-topic or leave the tag as is since it's wandered back
> to what's on topic or what isn't. Or maybe I'll just translate OT: to
> German and test localization ;-).
>
> Or I could just not send my response and then you'll never know what I
> did.
>

Well said!

>
> ciao,
>
> der.hans
> --
> #  http://www.LuftHans.com/        http://www.LuftHans.com/**Classes/<http://www.LuftHans.com/Classes/>
> #  "Lie detector eyeglasses perfected: Civilization collapses."
> #   -- Richard Powers

<snip --> respectfully trimmed per Mailing List Etiquite>

-- 

(503) 754-4452 Android
(623) 239-3392 Skype
(623) 688-3392 Google Voice
**
it-clowns.com <http://it-clowns.com/d/>
Chief Clown