I have no problem with Mint13. They never have forced me to do an update and when I do an update I can tell it what to (and not to) update :-)~MIKE~(-: On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 11:35 PM, wrote: > As a long-time Linux user, I have tried dozens of different Linux distros > and been repeatedly frustrated by the endless changes that often seem to > have made things worse (for me) rather than better. > > Of course, there have also been many improvements along the way, but I've > been burned so many times by doing an update that created a horrific mess > that I finally came to the point that I have kept one or more older > systems running an older version of some distro that I got to a reliable > state as a fall-back position when updates on newer distros created yet > another nightmare for me. > > The best (for me) system I ever had was PCLinuxOS with KDE 3.5 and I still > have it on a couple of my systems which I *never* "updated" and which have > remained rock solid. Simultaneously, I suffered through endless ongoing > nightmares with KDE 4 until I finally got a system that sort-of worked, > marginally, but with a lot of goofy, needless widgets and garbage that I > did not and do not want. > > Meanwhile, I tried numerous other distros and environments, none of which > were as stable, practical, versatile, and functional (to my liking) as PCL > KDE 3.5. > > Just as I started to get a PCL-KDE 4.6 to work reasonably well, PCL forced > some new so-called "updates" on me that wrecked the whole system and > caused it to completely quit working. So, I am finally fed up with PCL's > "rolling release" fiasco and trying, once again, to find a Linux distro > that I can "lock-in" without being subjected to yet more "updates" that > screw up my whole world and cause me endless wasted hours trying to fix > what wasn't broken before another nuisance "update." > > Since I have always preferred a Redhat based derivative, I've generally > tried to avoid anything *buntu based. Among the many dozens of distros > I've tried, older versions of Mandriva and PCLinux have been the > best/most-stable I've used. I also tried CentOS and Mageia but ran into > numerous problems with them. Also tried Mint, Suse, Arch, Puppy, Sabayon, > Slackware, Vector, Knoppix, Backtrack, Salix, among many more. I know that > I want nothing to do with gnome or unity. > > Recently I tried Kubuntu (12.04) and it seemed potentially pretty good > (with a few annoying problems), but then right after I installed it, I got > an "update" notice listing a huge number of changes it wants to do and I > thought "Oh, no, not again." > > So, please forgive the rant, but why can't we have stable Linux distro > that doesn't try to force endless "updates" on us? I hate updates. They > almost always mess up my systems. > > I just want a stable system that does not keep pushing changes. > > Are any of you Kubuntu users who have done all these hundreds of changes > to 12.04 without experiencing problems as a result? > > > > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >