I have never liked raid 5 but can still see its use. And while you are 100%
correct I have the statement that raid is not a back up it is a good
feature for performance needs and overall uptime so you can keep running in
case of single disk failure. Which I have dealt with.
On Jun 21, 2012 8:45 AM, "Carruth, Rusty" <Rusty.Carruth@smartstoragesys.com>
wrote:

> **
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: plug-discuss-bounces@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us on behalf of Eric
> Shubert
>
> On 06/19/2012 09:13 PM, Michael Butash wrote:
> > > So yeah, no raid is perfect...
> > >
> > ...
> > > -mb
> >
> > I use software raid strictly on servers, which are headless (of course).
> > ...
> >
> > I don't know why anyone would run SSDs in a raid. RAID IS NOT A BACKUP.
>
> Rather than my guessing, would you mind explaining your reasons?  I'm
> curious.
>
> > ...
> >
> > BL, *never* use fakeraid, and avoid raid-5 if possible. Disk space is no
> > longer expensive enough to justify using raid-5.
>
> Wow, someone else who agrees with me - IMHO, if its important enough to
> need raid, don't try to skimp and save a few bucks so you can lose your
> data!
>
> Rusty
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>