If that share is set to use specific permissions then the app cannot make them something else. So the trick is to force a specific set of permissions via samba. This I know can be done. Just cannot remember how I did it. On Jun 12, 2012 1:19 PM, "Shawn Badger" wrote: > I have tried that form the smb.conf, but it seems to be overridden by the > app. > Here is the snipit from my smb.conf for the share: > > [lab-test] > comment = Lab test > path = /mnt/lab-test > browseable = yes > public = yes > guest ok = yes > share modes = yes > create mode = 666 > directory mode = 777 > writeable = yes > > > Just so you know this is a test for a project I am working on, hence > the share comping from /mnt and the very laxed permissions. So please > no comments about it being really insecure. > > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Eric Shubert wrote: > > On 06/12/2012 08:23 AM, Shawn Badger wrote: > >> > >> I have an Android tablet running Cyanogenmod 7 that is using > >> CifsManager to mount a share. That all works well, but the problem I > >> am having is when an application (Jotta Text editor in this case) > >> creates a file on the share it creates it with a 600 file permission, > >> but when I create it from a terminal it creates the file with a 666 > >> file permission which is what I want. I am trying to figure out how to > >> change the way the application is saving the files. I have set the > >> smb.conf so the default file mode is 666 and also put file_mode=666 > >> in the options for CifsManager, but the applications seem to ignore > >> those settings. Does anyone know how to get the applications (without > >> changing the modifying it) to stop overriding the default? > > > > > > I usually control this on the server with the "create mask" option for > the > > file share. I expect this would take precedence over whatever the clients > > may specify. YMMV of course, depending on versions etc. > > > > Note, permission bits can also be affected by how the server is > configured > > (globally or per share) to map dos file attributes. If dos file > attributes > > are a concern, I prefer storing them in the extended attributes area, > > instead of mapping them to *nix permission bits: > > map archive = no > > map hidden = no > > map read only = no > > map system = no > > store dos attributes = yes > > dos filemode = yes > > > > HTH. > > > > -- > > -Eric 'shubes' > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------- > > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >