thanks for the tips gentlemen. I'll take care of it as soon as I can. On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 2:08 PM, Matt Graham wrote: > > On Mar 5, 2012 1:50 PM, "Michael Havens" wrote: > >> I hope this doesn't seem rude but why [resize images from huge to > >> smaller]]? I mean it is the proper size on the web page. > > If you have a limited amount of bandwidth available, sending a 50K 500x400 > JPEG is a lot less costly than sending a 1.3M 2500x2000 JPEG. Also, the > faster the page loads, the more page users seem to like it. ("5 seconds? > But > I want it NOW!!1!") > > From: Kevin Fries > > Some data connections are faster than others, and if you want to > > reach the widest possible market, you should build for the slowest > > users. > > To reach as many people as possible, you should also remember that "slow" > could refer to mental acuity as well as download velocity :-P > > -- > Matt G / Dances With Crows > The Crow202 Blog: http://crow202.org/wordpress/ > There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see > > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > -- :-)~MIKE~(-: