I have used CentOS, Slackware, Ubuntu, Fedora etc, when I mean "desktops" I mean the applications that run on top of them, but I understand your distinction. Regardless of which Desktop you actually use, the software that folks use on it remains basically the same. So yes, a "Linux Desktop" class would focus more on the GUI software world for Linux, rather than a particular desktop environment. Phil W. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Shubert" To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 10:06:26 AM Subject: Re: Summer Linux Classes at Mesa Community College On 05/23/2011 09:58 PM, der.hans wrote: > Am 23. May, 2011 schwätzte Phillip Waclawski so: > > >> I agree that we do indeed need to write a class for an "Intro to the >> Linux Desktop". > > I'm more interested in getting classes for desktop productivitity that > could include applications such as LibreOffice, GIMP, Inkscape, Blender, > GNUcash and OpenShot going. > > ( Phil does have a MySQL class coming up in the fall. ) > I'm going to nit pick the phrase "the Linux Desktop", as I don't think it really exists. A look at Fedora 15 (released today!) "spins" demonstrates the variety in desktop flavors. Desktop variations used to be simply Gnome and KDE, and now there are even more to choose from. So essentially, there is no "the Linux Desktop" per se. "Intro to Linux Desktops" might be appropriate however. I agree with Hans that the focus for desktops (as opposed to servers) should be on FLOSS applications. These transcend desktops, as well as OSs. After all, there's not a lot one can do with a desktop w/out an app. -- -Eric 'shubes' --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss