I thought IBM was only responsible for bad overly intellectualized
documentation and nazi war crimes?

http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/redp3861.html
http://www.acsa2000.net/ibm_and_hitler.htm

But, shirley you have IBM confused with RedHat?

Hey, I have been building production xSeries systems on Blades since before
your pants were plastic, kiddo!  But to say IBM's hardware contribution is
the "bulk of fedora development" here is quite a stretch?


http://news.cnet.com/Red-Hat-cancels-Fedora-Foundation/2100-7252_3-6058203.html

On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Joshua Zeidner <jjzeidner@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, May 3, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Lisa Kachold <lisakachold@obnosis.com>
> wrote:
> > Fedora 10 has to be my favorite distro this year.  It's absolutely
> amazing
> > just how easy Linux installation has become.  Setting up KDE and Gnome is
> > really simple to allow either.  Eclipse runs immediately from package
> > management install with all the plugins!
> >
> > Here's a great reference for setting up Fedora 10 Personal, with
> > instructions for adding repos, installing codecs, and turning off
> unneeded
> > services:      http://www.mjmwired.net/resources/mjm-fedora-f10.html
> >
> > Once you get all your codecs setup, test it with free television:
> > http://freetube.110mb.com/index.php?view=Ac3dmbW92aWVjaXR5
> >
> > And the patch process actually works!  I won't give you my "coding at 300
> > baud" ancient history stories, but this is the most powerful system,
> > incredibly created via open source submissions!
> > {I actually have had "discussions" with Linux admins who choose NEVER to
> > patch anything, believe it or not (partly because patch management was
> > rarely chosen over compiled sources, due to breakage and limitations)!}
> >
> > Discovery and reporting of security issues is swift, I can't imagine any
> way
> > a "profit" based company with top down hierarchical business plan
> management
> > could possibly compete with the open source model.
>
>   you mean like IBM, who is responsible for the bulk of Fedora development?
>
>  -jmz
>
> > Here's three security
> > issues reported so far:
> >
> > Fedora Directory Server before 10 allows remote attackers to obtain
> > sensitive information, such as the password from adm.conf via an IFRAME
> > element, probably involving an Apache httpd.conf configuration that
> orders
> > "allow" directives before "deny" directives.
> >
> http://www.securityspace.com/smysecure/catid.html?id=CVE-2005-3630&ctype=cve
> >
> > tog-pegasus in OpenGroup Pegasus 2.7.0 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)
> 5,
> > Fedora 9, and Fedora 10 does not log failed authentication attempts to
> the
> > OpenPegasus CIM server, which makes it easier for remote attackers to
> avoid
> > detection of password guessing attacks.
> >
> http://www.securityspace.com/smysecure/catid.html?id=CVE-2008-4315&ctype=cve
> >
> > ZoneMinder 1.23.3 on Fedora 10 sets the ownership of /etc/zm.conf to the
> > apache user account, and sets the permissions to 0600, which makes it
> easier
> > for remote attackers to modify this file by accessing it through a (1)
> PHP
> > or (2) CGI script.
> >
> http://www.securityspace.com/smysecure/catid.html?id=CVE-2008-6755&ctype=cve
> >
> > Anyone got any good suggestions for Fedora 10?
> >
> > www.obnosis.com (503)754-4452
> > "Contradictions do not exist." A. Rand
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>



-- 
www.obnosis.com (503)754-4452
"Contradictions do not exist." A. Rand