Eh, my last experience with setting up replication with postgres was not very fun. I have used Slony, and pgcluster, and pgpool. Setting up reliable replication with MySQL is a snap, and doesn't require any extra tools or daemons. In the past the biggest advantage of postgres over mysql was that postgres supported triggers, views, etc. But since MySQL 5 I'm not sure what postgres has that MySQL does not. If anything phpMyAdmin is 10 times more useful than pgmyadmin :-) -Charles Joshua Zeidner wrote: > > Actually we just got through that one... It seems that it is easier > to set up, but the supported concepts for replication in PostGres are > stronger. PG offered this feature very early on. > > -jmz > > > > On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Charles Jones > > wrote: > > I shall now make a blanket statement such as; "It is easier to setup > replication with MySQL". :P > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss