Not hitting, I would have to have been psychic to have been rolling for that (ironically it would probably just be more "proof" that it was fake info). The plane went right by my condo, I got a good view of it out of my window as it passed. By the time my roomate and I got a camera it had already hit and the Pentagon was on fire. I also saw the plane that was sent to do a flyby of the area, which for some time was denied to have happened. ...so yes, I didn't see the actual *impact* so the evil overlords could indeed have just flown a plane over, and fired their Global Hawk at the same time, and then high-tailed the plane out of there (the most common theory suggested to me). My girlfriend at the time was a contractor for the Pentagon reconstruction project, and that day was due to do a walk-through of the exact area that was destroyed. As luck would have it, she had spent the night at my place that night, and was running late to work. If she had gone to work from home, on time as usual, she would likely have been killed that day. Just another way that she and I will never forget that day! -Charles Joshua Zeidner wrote: > you have pictures/video of a plane hitting the Pentagon? > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Charles Jones > > wrote: > > It can be fun sometimes...I was an eyewitness to the pentagon > strike, I was *there*, I have pictures, and video, and yet people > have actually told me that I was brainwashed by the govt so that I > wouldn't reveal that it was a "global hawk" that hit and not a > plane. I find it incredible that these people who have never even > been within 2000 miles of ground zero or the Pentagon, are telling > ME that I am somehow mistaken about what happened there that day. > I think for some people it's just more "fun" to believe a > conspiracy because there is nothing else to do. I say fun because, > man, I gotta think that if someone *truly* believed that our govt > would kill thousands of people in broad daylight for some hidden > agenda, that they would be afraid to even step outside of their > house or own anything that would have them "on the grid". > > -Charles >