In that case, maybe you would love coding in assembly language. IMHO, it has its place, but personally, it's best enjoyed in very petite portion sizes. And to just get from point A to point B, even if I did not specfically drive a muscle car or something, I would prefer (outside of an antique car show), I would prefer something with A/C and a radio; and that doesn't have to be started by a crank like a lawn mower. -- Mike Schwartz Glendale AZ schwartz@acm.org Mike.L.Schwartz@gmail.com On 12/5/06, tuna@supertunaman.com wrote: > > I was wondering if it would hurt anything to run Gnome apps on KDE... > > And Model T's rock! I'd take a T over a Corvette any day! > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Jon M. Hanson > To: Main PLUG discussion list > Sent: Tuesday, December 5, 2006 3:40:38 PM > Subject: Re: Cost of running KDE apps with Gnome > > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 15:34, Dazed_75 wrote: > > I prefer Gnome to KDE generally, but there are some KDE apps that are > > really nice [...] > > > > 1) Might I lose any functionality running the KDE apps under Gnome? > > 2) Are there definitive caveats or known problems doing so (or a list > > somewhere)? > > 3) Is there any way to get an idea of how badly resources are being > wasted? > > > > Specific example: Comparing AmaroK to Sound Juicer is like comparing a > 67 > > Corvette to a Model T. [...] > > Arts [...] is > KDE's sound server. [...] > -- > Jon M. Hanson (N7ZVJ) > [...] > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - [...] > > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - [...]