Just an FYI, Cox has discontinued support for the Toshiba DOCSIS modems. I switched to a new modem and the speed is about 2 times faster now. ; ) On 2/13/06, John Seth wrote: > > I'm on the East Side of Central (close to 32nd st & McDowell). I've > had my moment's with Cox, quite a few... sporadic up & down, bad tv > signal. But, mysteriously after I complained almost every night for a > week straight, they called me up and said something to the effect of "We > made some billing changes and have a tech out there straightening things > out for us..." (wha? ... and why wasn't this done before?) > > Now, my 'net connection has been fairly solid (down once in the past > 3 weeks), my tv clear, and my phone works. My 'net connection is faster, > and I believe they actually did increase the speed as they claimed, and > they also block ANY port 25 traffic (in/out), and port 80. I haven't > tried any other ports, but I hope they'd block windows ports, I don't > want my neighbor seeing my systems, not that I'd let them). > > My phone is another story, at one point they thought I cancelled my > phone service, then I called them and screamed, and that was fixed, then > the voicemail and "extras" had to be reprogrammed into the router my > phone went into... add another 2 days. Again, it's fine now, and clear > as a whistle. Someone else mentioned using their cell for Long > Distance... I do that as well as Cox seems adamant about $.05/min for > any long distance. > > I have the full digital package, Digital TV with 100's of channels, > digital phone and Basic Internet ... $99.95 (+$20 in fees and taxes). > I'm new to AZ, and have yet to have Qwest, but I've had these problems > with almost any provider, except the one I worked for in NY. I agree > with someone else's quote with a slight modification: "they all suck, > pick the one you have the least". > > Just my two, long winded, coppers... > > Tony > > > > Kurt Granroth wrote: > > On Feb 13, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Mark Jarvis wrote: > >> 3) QWEST promises download speed of 1+ MByte/sec. (This doesn't sound > >> correct to me--I thought that DSL was slower, but . . .) > > > > That doesn't sound right. Maybe 1MBit/s or so would be more likely. I > > don't think I've ever seen any network throughput advertised in > > megabytes per second. Cox is typically thought of as the faster service > > and I think it offers 5 MBit/s. 1 MByte/s would be (roughly!) 8 MBit/s. > > > > Hrm.. now that I think of it, Cox bumped their download speed a few > > months back. I wonder if they are more than 8 MBit/s these days. I do > > know that my downloads have been noticeably faster. In the past, I was > > happy with 450KByte/s but now I often get over 600KByte/s > > > > Kurt > > --------------------------------------------------- > > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: > > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > > > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > -- ..::Randy Melder::.. Need Internet programming and multimedia? http://www.spininternetmedia.com/ Need a domain name and/or economy hosting? http://spindomains.us/