I thought I'd read there was some native encryption in btrfs
added at some point, but seems they indicate to just continue to
use luks here too. All in all, I'm trying to remove these
"layers", otherwise I'm pretty good with just sticking to my
current mechanisms. This is what they seem to indicate doing, but
now I still need either efi or grub partitions again. Ugh.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Dm-crypt/Encrypting_an_entire_system#Creating_btrfs_subvolumes
I have tried both, and the built in nature of BTRFS has sold me over ZFS. Both worked great for me, but BTRFS is batteries included. That being said, I pretty much exclusively use Arch which tends to have much more current everything than Ubuntu.
Kevin
On Dec 3, 2016 12:22 PM, "Michael Butash" <mike@butash.net> wrote:
Anyone using "alternative" file system methods like btrfs or zfs to boot with? Nothing seems too native, but can be made to work it seems, just wondering if this is one of those "should do" vs. "can do".
The notion of something that can do raid, encryption, volume management, and snapshot features is attractive, but I've always layered mdraid, luks encryption, lvm, then ext atop that. This has been pretty solid when the ssd's don't die 3-6 months later, even with aligning partition to block boundaries and such, trim, etc. I'd love to have one single encrypted partitions I can use volumes within for the os mounts, btrfs and zfs in theory do most of this now.
How well is really the question...
Commentary appreciated!
-mb
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss