Am 30. Oct, 2010 schwätzte Eric Shubert so:

> On 10/30/2010 07:18 AM, Lisa Kachold wrote:
>> I don't think anything but the best,
>> most state of art Drupal installation should be in place for a Linux
>> group, but that's just me.
>> 
>
> I agree with this, as I expect most PLUG members would.
> Is this an impractical goal?
> Is there some reason it cannot be done? What would it take?
> Lisa seems to indicate that perhaps Hans needs to delegate some of his 
> responsibilities, or am I reading her comments wrong?

To whom? :)

( BTW, this isn't directed directly at you or anybody else. Indeed, your
successful server build workshop is proof that you are helping PLUG. )

I have delegated it and it hasn't happened. The upgrades that did
happen were because I finally took time to do the upgrades. Others have
helped with site or OS maintenance ( specifically Alex, Larry, Brian,
Jason, Lisa, Dennis, Ryan and Andrew ( and probably others ) ), but Drupal
updates languished.

As before, the key with moving to Joomla! is with the stipulation that I
don't have to do web site maintenance. We moved to Drupal when the
stipulation didn't hold true before. I hope the Joomla! move this time is
successful and we truly have a group maintaining it. There is so much we
can do for PLUG, but *we* need to do it.

I think we should regularly get OS and application updates, especially
security updates.

It would also be great to get new functionality when it becomes available.

I honestly don't care what we run ( as long as it's Free Software ). What
I want is something that can be a great resource for the group and helps
us build out a more vibrant community.

It would be awesome if I could delegate everything I do for PLUG :).

ciao,

der.hans
-- 
#  http://www.LuftHans.com/        http://www.LuftHans.com/Classes/
#  "The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and
#  write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn." -- Alvin Toffler