Am 06. Sep, 2006 schwätzte Mike Schwartz so: > On 9/6/06, Alan Dayley wrote: >> We left HTML to allow members to contribute to the site. In the end, >> we have not had very many contributions from the general >> membership, for whatever reason. > > I may not be [completely] keeping up, here (sorry), > but I thought that ("allow members to contribute to the site") > was what a wiki was for; > (also, an archive of the mail lists, such as this one...) > just 0.02, ...from: A wiki is one way of allowing people to contribute. As it's setup anyone can submit articles and links for use on the PLUG web site. There are a few moderators who can then approve them to be published to the site. It's a slashdot type of setup. We welcome more contributors and more moderators. Articles are used for meeting announcements, job postings, class schedules for local community colleges, ... We don't want to split people between the site and the list, but we also want to have enough info on the site to draw in people just discovering PLUG. ciao, der.hans -- # https://www.LuftHans.com/ http://www.CiscoLearning.org/ # Join the League of Professional System Administrators! https://LOPSA.org/ # Fairy Tale, n.: A horror story to prepare children for the newspapers.