(I) have switched to "Brother" exclusively  (3 lasers, 1 inkjet and a
ADS-2000 scanner.  They all have performed flawlessly with no jams.
Inkjets SUCK if you don't use them consistently.  The latent ink in the
heads and tubes dry out and trash the printer.   If ever I decide (I)
need color again, (I) will be going color LASER.  Yes, it IS much more
expensive, BUT at least I won't need to deal with dried out inks.

FLIP SIDE: EPSON inks supposedly are archive quality though and it
probably will be cheaper to become a heroin addict instead of buying
ink. Still, their inks I believe are rated 20 or 25 years if printouts
are stored properly AND 6 cartridges give better color accuracy.


Hope I helped.  ;-)


On 01/24/2016 09:26 PM, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> My old HP gave up the ghost so I'm in the market. Reading the reviews it
> seems that HP quality has gone down the tubes lately, especially in the
> low and mid levels. Epson had decent reviews but 6 ink cartridges? Give
> me a break.
> 
> I'd like some opinions from the group on printers in general and HP vs
> Epson in particular.
> 
> TIA 
> 
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss