On Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:25:59 -0700 Ed wrote: > about systemd: > 1) change is never easy > 2) an admins life is easier if all the machines are systemd or are not > systemd - a mix is a pain > 3) migration is not a discontinuity - any SysV init scripts you have > will continue to work - systemd will do it's async thing and then go > through any legacy init scripts one after the other. > 4) more than init scripts are changing - sorry - SysV had a sharp > focus and traditional unix design principles, systemd has a broader > frame of what is involved in managing processes.* (VMS anyone) > 5) Some of the goals are to have signed systems from snout to tail and > also fully isolated processes all the way down to the kernel and the > ending of dll hell via BTrFS integration - among others... How does this relate to init systems like Epoch, Runit, s6, Nosh, Perp and the like? SteveT Steve Litt October 2015 featured book: Thriving in Tough Times http://www.troubleshooters.com/thrive --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss