Hi, Mike: I had been making my own set of gcc cross-compilers to cross-build my ttylinux distribution, but I've switched to using crosstool-ng. Maybe ttylinux can help you in some way, maybe with some modifications; it is fairly easy to hack(I say that but I made it). ttylinux is basically a cross-built kernel and busybox; it boots to RAM Disk and has an install script that transfers the whole system to a flash drive. http://ttylinux.net/ Look me up. I work in the same building you do. On 05/13/14 14:39, Mike Bushroe wrote: > I am working on the switch/routers that form the backbone of the > Space Station LAN (Joint Station LAN or JSL). The ppc processors that > control the switching fabric, perform the routing functions, SNMP, and > all other network functions are about 10 years old. Parts of the Flash > have been updated frequently for Firmware Upgrades. But the OS files > (Linux 2.4.22-1.3 "Red Haggis" Kernel) have never been refreshed and are > at the end of the manufacture's data retention time. It looks like I may > need to cross-compile a stripped down version of busybox, load it into > the ramdisk, change root to the ramdisk, unmount then remount (?) the > Flash drive to make sure no files are active, then run a script to go > through every file in the system to copy it, md5sum old and new, if no > errors delete the old and rename the new. > > From what I have read so far, this will require getting a copy of > the kernel header files, which the vendor of the card is not currently > willing to do. The next best would be to get the generic header files > for this or a close release and use those. I am also confused about this > process. The header files define the functions and variables, but not > their address in memory. I am assuming that dynamic linking to the > kernel function happens when the program starts, or are the function > calls all sent to one address which then determines which call was > requested and branches of to the correct code? Or is there another > file(s) that contains the loader information on the kernel routines and > I will need to find or decipher that too before a successful > cross-compile can happen? > > Sorry to dump a tough one on the group when I have added little > recently, but if I can get this going soon enough, it might actually get > used on the flight hardware. Otherwise it will be deemed a 'science > project' and cancelled in favor of just copying over the minimum number > of system files to run the script and using that instead of a stripped > busy box. On the other hand, if I can get this to work, I can also tweak > the nandflash calls to attempt to recover bad blocks that are only bad > because the data aged out. Currently, all the programs that work with > nand flash don't allow any interaction with marked bad blocks. But if > the blocks only failed because the data evaporated, a few write - erase > cycles should freshen it back up to being fully functional and probably > just as reliable as the blocks that hadn't aged out yet! > > > Mike > -- > "Creativity is intelligence having fun." — Albert Einstein > > > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss