> On Mar 5, 2012 1:50 PM, "Michael Havens" wrote: >> I hope this doesn't seem rude but why [resize images from huge to >> smaller]]? I mean it is the proper size on the web page. If you have a limited amount of bandwidth available, sending a 50K 500x400 JPEG is a lot less costly than sending a 1.3M 2500x2000 JPEG. Also, the faster the page loads, the more page users seem to like it. ("5 seconds? But I want it NOW!!1!") From: Kevin Fries > Some data connections are faster than others, and if you want to > reach the widest possible market, you should build for the slowest > users. To reach as many people as possible, you should also remember that "slow" could refer to mental acuity as well as download velocity :-P -- Matt G / Dances With Crows The Crow202 Blog: http://crow202.org/wordpress/ There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss