Craig White wrote: > I can't quite figure out if this is an indictment on all Linux in > general or the specific distribution that he uses but this is pathetic. > > If the distribution you choose to use breaks because you update, > you need to find a different one...period, end of discussion. Craig, your comment in response to my question seeking assistance regarding 'scp' is not only unhelpful, but it conveys an implication that I am (in your opinion) "pathetic" because of my choice (and necessity) to keep this one computer (of the six different computer systems that I use) unchanged. It is not possible to safely update this particular computer. This "old reliable" system is the one on which I do much of my work because it incorporates a configuration and capabilities that are no longer available and cannot be replicated. Rather than being "pathetic," it is actually remarkable that this old system has proved to be the *most* rock-solid reliable of all of my systems. It has been running 24/7 for more than 4 years. It is never shut down except for power outages and vacations. And, praise God, I have *never* had a system failure or need to reboot. This current issue with scp seems to have occurred because I changed routers as became necessary to get a faster DSL speed. I had not needed 'scp' since that change until recently, and I have now learned that it was apparently because of enabling "IP Passthrough" that the inet address got messed up and I have not been able to get it restored. Craig, you have sometimes offered some helpful suggestions on various issues in the past (although often with a rather abrupt tone). However this kind of belittling ridicule is definitely not helpful. It is so much more helpful when comments are of a more positive and constructive nature and tone. --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss