our founding fathers also owned slaves. -jmz On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 3:19 PM, Lisa Kachold wrote: > Who cares, the founding fathers are dead. > > It's the living I care about; people can't continue to pretend that > allowing each other to do things that KILL amount to "respect" or some > basardized agrandized "American Way"! > > Washington, Jefferson, and my ancestor Mifflin (signed the Bill of > Rights) were talking about race, religion and thought (including > science). > > They spoke out clearly against things known to kill!  Sheesh!  What foolishness! > > On 8/2/09, keith smith wrote: >> >> Canada health care is not efficient. >> >> And why should someone have the authority to ell some else they cannot >> smoke, drink, or eat cheese burgers. >> >> If our Founding Fathers read this they would scream. >> >> >> ------------------------ >> Keith Smith >> >> >> --- On Sun, 8/2/09, Lisa Kachold wrote: >> >>> From: Lisa Kachold >>> Subject: Re: ****Re: guess what.... >>> To: "Main PLUG discussion list" >>> Date: Sunday, August 2, 2009, 2:35 PM >>> One of the 2 former posts is typical >>> "party diatribe"; you decide which! >>> >>> The irony of no health care in our economy is that unless >>> you >>> constantly replace people (who die, fail to make it in >>> employment or >>> become homeless)  [while also keeping the subset of >>> "healthy" >>> individuals completely separate] you win. >>> >>> The benefit of socialized health care includes research >>> and >>> statistics, eradication of diseases like STD's, TB and >>> childhood >>> illness, and control of the flu, and geratric survivial >>> (which assists >>> our children's children socially).  The system can >>> support it, and in >>> 20 years the benefits in advances in technology, industry >>> and spcial >>> stability are incredible. >>> >>> It's humane, and it's required to eradicate smoking, drug >>> and alcohol >>> abuse (often self medication for physical and emotional >>> illness) >>> alone. >>> >>> All systems in our society are inefficient - that doesn't >>> mean we >>> don't need IT systems for instance, it means we need >>> EFFICIENCY >>> (Canada as an example). >>> My father would turn over in his grave, since he also >>> wanted a free >>> economy, but would agree that people are worth health >>> care. >>> >>> Now, border control is another issue entirely! >>> >>> >>> On 8/2/09, Craig White >>> wrote: >>> > On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 19:16 -0700, Vaughn Treude >>> wrote: >>> >> Lisa Kachold wrote: >>> >> > On 7/30/09, JD Austin >>> wrote: >>> >> > >>> >> >> The 'other' model isn't working any >>> better.  My wife works in an Urgent >>> >> >> Care; tons of Canadians come here to get >>> the health care they need.  I >>> >> >> think >>> >> >> the whole industry needs to be more >>> competitive; most things in health >>> >> >> care >>> >> >> shouldn't cost what they do. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> > Inefficiency in preventative care, >>> diagnostics, errors in surgery, the >>> >> > truth is incredibly expensive. >>> >> > >>> >> > But just because Canadians come here for care >>> doesn't mean it's not >>> >> > working. >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> If by "working", you mean the majority of >>> Canadians people accept it, >>> >> and even think it's a good thing, I suppose it is. >>> They're just very >>> >> lucky they have a "safety valve", that is, a large >>> semi-free country >>> >> whose borders are within 100 miles of 90% of their >>> population. >>> >> Single-payer is, IMHO, the biggest piece of >>> economic foolishness ever >>> >> devised. Let's give an absolute monopoly to the >>> most inefficient, >>> >> corrupt organization ever invented by humans >>> (government.) As for the >>> >> notion that socialized medicine is cheaper, I >>> don't believe it for a >>> >> second. Governments can shift their costs to other >>> agencies; the >>> >> Pentagon does it all the time. I assume, for >>> example, the cost of having >>> >> "premiums" collected by the CRA doesn't get >>> counted in the balance >>> >> sheet. Not to mention the fact that a huge portion >>> of the overhead costs >>> >> of private insurers in the US is red tape imposed >>> by government >>> >> bureaucracies. >>> >> Not that I'm necessarily endorsing the current >>> system. There were a lot >>> >> of good not-for-profit medical insurers in this >>> country until Richard >>> >> Nixon changed the tax laws, causing a massive >>> takeover by greedy HMO's. >>> >> I'd like to see a system of decentralized medical >>> cooperatives with >>> >> for-profit companies as a supplement. >>> >> BTW, I don't blame the immigrants, but I do blame >>> the lawyers. :-) >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> No offense, just my two cents. :-) >>> >> There, I feel so much better. >>> >> Vaughn >>> > ---- >>> > seeing as how the political discussions do not die >>> off, I am going to >>> > sound off here. >>> > >>> > The entire premise of the Canadian health care system >>> was to provide a >>> > single tier of medical coverage for all and no amount >>> of wealth would >>> > provide a better level of health care. You cannot >>> devise a system that >>> > is more fundamentally fair to everyone. >>> > >>> > The people who come here from Canada are doing >>> elective surgeries either >>> > not covered by the health care system in Canada or >>> prioritized in a >>> > manner that does not suit the person with money to pay >>> elsewhere. >>> > >>> > The language that you use Vaughn is loaded and >>> inaccurate... >>> > - we are not a safety valve, we provide elective >>> medical care to those >>> > who want to pay and go elsewhere. >>> > >>> > - the issue of a monopolized health care run by the >>> government happens >>> > to be that which is practiced in all other western >>> nations. We spend >>> > more per capita on health care than any other >>> industrialized nation and >>> > yet approximately 25% of our citizens do not have >>> coverage. >>> > >>> > - the insurance companies do worse managing the health >>> care than >>> > government could ever do. They practice murder by >>> spreadsheet. They >>> > invent rules for exclusions. Someone in this country >>> WITH health >>> > insurance goes bankrupt in this country every 30 >>> seconds because of >>> > exclusions, deductibles, etc. >>> > >>> > - blaming the government red tape for the profits of >>> insurers is absurd >>> > to its core. >>> > >>> > An American citizen visiting Canada can get free >>> health care if needed. >>> > >>> > Any solution short of single-payer will fail and we >>> will be back here >>> > again, with more people excluded from coverage by >>> insurance companies, >>> > more people bankrupted by illness only because the >>> companies with >>> > profits at stake...insurance companies and drug >>> companies will spend >>> > unreasonable amounts of money to influence public >>> opinion and elected >>> > candidates. >>> > >>> > Craig >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > This message has been scanned for viruses and >>> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >>> > believed to be clean. >>> > >>> > --------------------------------------------------- >>> > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us >>> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail >>> settings: >>> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://linuxgazette.net/165/kachold.html >>> (623)239-3392 >>> (503)754-4452 www.obnosis.com >>> --------------------------------------------------- >>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us >>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail >>> settings: >>> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------- >> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: >> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >> > > > -- > http://linuxgazette.net/165/kachold.html > (623)239-3392 > (503)754-4452 www.obnosis.com > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss