On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 09:59:09PM -0700, Kurt Granroth wrote:
> That really smacks of a GNU sed bug to me.  I just tend to think that
> something like this would have been discovered a long time ago and so
> perhaps we're just using it incorrectly.

First, nice work pinning it down a bit more! :)

This is surely an issue with GNU sed, as my BSD sed does not have this
issue (old & new stuff both work as expected). It's interesting that
you're getting different results than the original problem. Different
versions of GNU sed, perhaps? If so, then the "issue" is still mutating.

-- 
Darrin Chandler            |  Phoenix BSD User Group  |  MetaBUG
dwchandler@stilyagin.com   |  http://phxbug.org/      |  http://metabug.org/
http://www.stilyagin.com/  |  Daemons in the Desert   |  Global BUG Federation
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss