On Sat, 2008-01-05 at 23:10 -0700, der.hans wrote: > That's why I suggested we try to help Howell. I don't support illegally > sharing copyrighted works. I also don't support large corporations > with deep pockets suing people into oblivion. I especially don't > support the big companies if they're using that case to try to cause me > problems. Trying to curtail fair use is definitely something that causes > me problems. ---- Ray Beckerman has a fairly extensive breakdown for Howell on the web site that was linked by Chris... If Howell or any friend of Howell is monitoring... http://williampatry.blogspot.com/2007/12/establishment-press-takes-riaa-on.html very near the bottom of the page Ray Beckerman said... 1. The judge asked the parties to brief this question "Does the record in this case show that defendant Howell possessed an “unlawful copy” of the plaintiff’s copyrighted material...?" 2. The answer he got to that particular question was not responsive. It was this: "It is undisputed that Defendant possessed unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs’ copyrighted sound recordings on his computer. Exhibit B to Plaintiffs’ Complaint is a series of screen shots showing the sound recording and other files found in the KaZaA shared folder on Defendant’s computer on January 30, 2006. (SOF, Doc. No. 31, at ¶¶ 4-6); Exhibit 12 to SOF at ¶¶ 13, 17-18.) Virtually all of the sound recordings on Exhibit B are in the “.mp3” format. (Exhibit 10 to SOF, showing virtually all audio files with the “.mp3” extension.) Defendant admitted that he converted these sound recordings from their original format to the .mp3 format for his and his wife’s use. (Howell Dep. 107:24 to 110:2; 114:1 to 116:16). The .mp3 format is a “compressed format [that] allows for rapid transmission of digital audio files from one computer to another by electronic mail or any other file transfer protocol.” Napster, 239 F.3d at 1011. Once Defendant converted Plaintiffs’ recording into the compressed .mp3 format and they are in his shared folder, they are no longer the authorized copies distributed by Plaintiffs." 3. The other answers the plaintiffs' gave to other questions are irrelevant. All I was ever reporting on was the answer to the question as to whether the copies on the computer were themselves "unlawful". 4. From those who think that the RIAA wasn't talking about copying cd's into mp3's, I have yet to hear a satisfactory explanation for the RIAA's inclusion of the following language in its answer: "It is undisputed that Defendant possessed unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs’ copyrighted sound recordings on his computer. Exhibit B to Plaintiffs’ Complaint is a series of screen shots showing the sound recording and other files found in the KaZaA shared folder on Defendant’s computer on January 30, 2006. (SOF, Doc. No. 31, at ¶¶ 4-6); Exhibit 12 to SOF at ¶¶ 13, 17-18.) Virtually all of the sound recordings on Exhibit B are in the “.mp3” format. (Exhibit 10 to SOF, showing virtually all audio files with the “.mp3” extension.) Defendant admitted that he converted these sound recordings from their original format to the .mp3 format for his and his wife’s use. (Howell Dep. 107:24 to 110:2; 114:1 to 116:16). The .mp3 format is a “compressed format [that] allows for rapid transmission of digital audio files from one computer to another by electronic mail or any other file transfer protocol.” Napster, 239 F.3d at 1011. Once Defendant converted Plaintiffs’ recording into the compressed .mp3 format....." 10:45 PM --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss