a noteable aspect to all of this is that these terms are sufficiently complex where the average person is going to look for some kind of insurance against liability that is /simple and complete/. History has shown that Open Source cannot really offer that. Certainly a non-profit agent will not really be able to offer insurance for free. -jmz On Jan 2, 2008 12:15 PM, Chris Gehlker wrote: > > On Jan 2, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Craig White wrote: > > > except of course that it is disputed... > > You are absolutely correct. In fact I had read that and simply forgot. > Subsequently I read this: > > "It is undisputed that Defendant possessed unauthorized copies of > Plaintiffs' copyrighted sound recordings on his computer. Exhibit B > to Plaintiffs' Complaint is a series of screen shots showing the sound > recording and other files found in the KaZaA shared folder on > Defendant's computer on January 30, 2006. (SOF, Doc. No. 31, at ¶¶ 4- > 6); Exhibit 12 to SOF at ¶¶ 13, 17-18.) Virtually all of the sound > recordings on Exhibit B are in the ".mp3" format. (Exhibit 10 to SOF, > showing virtually all audio files with the ".mp3" extension.) > Defendant admitted that he converted these sound recordings from their > original format to the .mp3 format for his and his wife's use. > (Howell Dep. 107:24 to 110:2; 114:1 to 116:16). The .mp3 format is a > "compressed format [that] allows for rapid transmission of digital > audio files from one computer to another by electronic mail or any > other file transfer protocol." Napster, 239 F.3d at 1011. Once > Defendant converted Plaintiffs' recording into the compressed .mp3 > format and they are in his shared folder, they are no longer the > authorized copies distributed by Plaintiffs. Moreover, Defendant had > no authorization to distribute Plaintiffs' copyrighted recordings from > his KaZaA shared folder." > > I did fail to make the distinction between it being 'undisputed' that > the files were on his computer and it being 'undisputed' that they > were in his Kazaa shared folder. I guess he is asserting that the RIAA > photoshopped Exhibit B and that they are not real screen shots. > > > Why are you so eager to convict? > > Huh? This is a civil case. No one is at risk of being convicted. > -- > In America, anybody can be president. That's one of the risks you take. > -Adlai Stevenson, statesman (1900-1965) > --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss