After a long battle with technology, der.hans wrote: > Am 21. Sep, 2007 schwzte Craig White so: > > suit yourself - bear in mind that Red Hat really really likes to use > > 'File system labels' for mounting (as you noted in /etc/fstab) and > > therefore, when you manually partition, make sure you use sensible label > > names so Red Hat can keep track. > The installer is still adding and using labels. I'm also moving everything > over to labels anyway. How do you read and assign labels to LVM > partitions? You don't. A partition of type 0x8e typically has one PV in it. The PV belongs to a VG. A VG has one or more LVs in it. The LVs are roughly equivalent to ordinary disk partitions; you make filesystems within the LVs. You can run e2label or tune*fs on an LV. When I did this for a multiboot 64/32-bit system, I had LVs named /dev/vg/usr32 and /dev/vg/usr64. Their ext3 labels were "usr32" and "usr64", even though I never mounted by label. > > the concept of using labels instead of devices comes from the notion > > that bios alterations, SAN systems, etc. will present drives to the > > system in varying ways but a label never changes. > Yeah, I like them :). ...then you have situations like installing CentOS 3 and CentOS 4 to different disks on the same system without changing the installer's defaults. So you have 2 filesystems with LABEL="root" (or something) and stupidity ensues. I haven't done this but people on comp.os.linux.misc have. (This means that at some point, they'll move from mount-by-label to mount-by-UUID, and that'll be fairly icky and incomprehensible.) -- Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely unintentional side effect. --Linus Torvalds There is no Darkness in Eternity/But only Light too dim for us to see --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss