On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 01:23:43AM -0700, der.hans wrote:
> 
> I think it would be better to work with PLUG rather than starting a new
> org. As Alan mentioned, PLUG stuff happens because someone makes it
> happen. Alexander did just that with the InstallFests, which have now been
> going for a couple of years.
> 
> The founders of PLUG haven't been involved in years. PLUG has continued
> without them because people stepped up to make things happen as the
> founders and subsequent past leaders drifted away. I hope it will continue
> as I and the other leaders move on.
> 
> I see no reason why PLUG can't be the local group or affiliate for various
> distributions or packages or even other orgnizations. For instance, I hope
> PLUG will be a local affiliate for LOPSA once LOPSA is ready to start
> making such relationships.

I think this is a great idea. Obviously, many PLUG members use some form
of Ubuntu. As long as a LoCo can exist within PLUG without
organizational conflicts it seems like a nice fit. I don't know any
specifics of what a LoCo requires, but hopefully there won't be any
showstoppers.

OT: It'd be nice to have some kind of "History of PLUG." I would be
interested, anyway.

-- 
Darrin Chandler            |  Phoenix BSD Users Group
dwchandler@stilyagin.com   |  http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/
http://www.stilyagin.com/  |
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss