That brings up a good point. When I compiled qmail on a VPS, it started failing. Turned out I did not have enough capacity. $150 later, I had a bigger VPS and all went well. George Toft, CISSP, MSIS My IT Department www.myITaz.com 480-544-1067 Confidential data protection experts for the financial industry. keith smith wrote: > You both make a lot of good points. > > I've read tons of good things about Qmail and PostFix. I can't recall > now but I seem to have read Qmail was top gun. > > The problem with Qmail is it is hard to configure. As it was explained > the Toaster can lead Grandma to success. That is what I need! > > I wonder what my hosting provider is going to do if I launch what was > explained as a 4 hour compile and I would figure longer on a VPS. > > I would like to try the Qmail install because it seems almost simple > after looking at the Toaster. > > The turn side is do a few yum commands and figure out how to configure > PostFix and I'm done in an hour or two. > > Any simple PostFix Grandma walk throughs? > > Thanks a bunch for all the feed back. > Keith > > > */Craig White /* wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-07-11 at 19:38 -0700, Eric "Shubes" wrote: > > > > The packaging restrictions on Qmail are anti-GPL. > > > > Of course they're non-GPL, but anti-GPL? What the heck is > anti-GPL? How > > can a license be anti-GPL? > ---- > clarification - not compatible with GPL, cannot be distributed with GPL > packages. > ---- > > > > They are what they are. That's DJB's call. I don't necessarily agree > > with his philosophies, but that doesn't diminish the quality of the > > software. > ---- > it sort of does in my opinion. > ---- > > > > > The mechanics of Qmail > > > don't allow easy integration of really nice mail server add-ons > such as > > > greylisting and content scanning (MailScanner comes to mind here). > > > > I wouldn't try to tackle qmail in and of (by) itself, but the qmail > > toaster is pre-integrated with many desirable add-ons, and it's also > > preconfigured and tested. No need to assemble the pieces. That > feature > > alone was a significant factor to me. > ---- > MailScanner is brilliant and it isn't available as part of Qmail or > toaster, nor is greylisting. Heck, greylisting skims 70-95% of the spam > off the top before you ever bother doing SMTP/DNSRBL/virus/spam checks > and considerably lightens the mail load. > > Craig > > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss